Wade Foster.
CEO · Zapier
C-Suite marketing leader with proven impact driving growth at start-ups, scale ups, and established brands. Expertise in full-funnel demand creation, marketing research and strategy, integrated funnel marketing, brand development and execution, communications, creative studio leadership, leading high-performing teams, and cross-functional partnerships.
Guest
Wade Foster
CEO
Company:
Zapier
Location:
Sunnyvale, California
Loading episode...
Listen onApple PodcastsSpotify

In this episode of How I Hire, Andy Mowat speaks with Wade Foster, Co-founder & CEO of Zapier, about his counterintuitive discovery that doing 20+ reference calls per executive finalist was the breakthrough that fixed his 50/50 executive hiring hit rate. Wade shares why he returned to approving every offer after watching standards slip, his specific reference questions that reveal culture fit across a decade of companies, and how he shifted from hiring impressive resumes to deliberately assembling executive teams with complementary behavioral traits.

His insights reveal how auditing process thoroughness rather than overriding decisions, and treating references as puzzle piece collection rather than validation, can transform executive hiring outcomes.

Topics discussed:

ABOUT YOUR HOST: 

Andy Mowat has built GTM engines for top companies throughout his career. He led Revenue Operations and Demand Gen at four unicorns, including scaling from $10M to $100M ARR at both Upwork and Culture Amp, and helping guide Box and Carta through IPO scale. With a passion for connecting people, Andy has advised executives on their careers for years and launched Whispered to make searching for executive roles less intimidating.

Learn more about about Whispered: www.whispered.com

Interact with AI Andy: www.whispered.com/whisper-search

Five takeaways from this conversation.

Actionable for Whispered Hiring founders

  1. Assemble Executive Teams for Behavioral Traits, Not Just Functions
    Wade shifted from hiring individual executives with impressive resumes to deliberately building teams where behavioral traits are as intentionally distributed as functional roles. You need bold risk-takers, operational excellence, and storytelling ability represented across your team. This requires brutal self-awareness about your own CEO strengths and gaps first. Wade spent years using engagement surveys, deep 360 reviews, and exec offsite feedback sessions to understand which weaknesses to cover versus which strengths to double down on.
  2. Audit Hiring Process Thoroughness, Not Candidate Quality
    Wade returned to approving every offer at Zapier after watching standards slip when he stepped back. But he's not evaluating candidates directly. He's asking hiring managers: did we probe where we needed to probe? Did we pull on the yellow flags? This maintains the bar without creating the dynamic where managers defer decisions upward. His commitment: sub-24-hour approval SLA so he never becomes the bottleneck.
  3. Collect 20+ Reference Data Points to Build a Complete Mosaic
    Wade's reference methodology involves talking to multiple managers, peers, direct reports, and founder/CEOs across companies spanning a decade of the candidate's career. His most revealing question: compare this person to the best you've ever worked with, rate them 1-10, and what would close the gap to 10? He also asks what the candidate's biggest fans and critics will say, then uses those predictions in subsequent calls to create more honest conversations.
  4. Treat All-Green References as a Red Flag
    Wade learned that fully positive references at the executive level should make you suspicious. Successful leaders are necessarily demanding plus supportive, which inevitably creates mixed feedback. He specifically asks references about the culture where the candidate worked: what types of people thrived, what types didn't? Then he compares that environment to Zapier to assess fit rather than just competence.
  5. Bring Reference Findings Back for Mutual Evaluation
    After completing references, Wade brings all findings back to the finalist candidate. He explicitly names strengths and growth areas, identifies where he thinks they'd be taking a chance together, then encourages them to back-channel him as CEO too. As Wade puts it: are we both signing up for each other's beautiful mess? This creates honest commitment rather than hoping it works out.